Sunday, December 5th, 2010 | Post a comment
Hillary Clinton warns North Korea and Iran nuclear programmes could spark arms race
Tensions rise after U.S. and Japan hold military training exercises in region
Continue reading »

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visits the Natanz nuclear enrichment facility
Ho New / Reuters
In late 2006, George W. Bush met with the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the Pentagon and asked if military action against Iran’s nuclear program was feasible. The unanimous answer was no. Air strikes could take out some of Iran’s nuclear facilities, but there was no way to eliminate all of them. Some of the nuclear labs were located in heavily populated areas; others were deep underground. And Iran’s ability to strike back by unconventional means, especially through its Hizballah terrorist network, was formidable. The military option was never officially taken off the table. At least, that’s what U.S. officials always said. But the emphasis was on the implausibility of a military strike. “Another war in the Middle East is the last thing we need,” Secretary of Defense Robert Gates wrote in 2008. It would be “disastrous on a number of levels.” (See pictures of President Bush in the Middle East.)
Continue reading »

Among Greece’s questioned costs is more than a billion euros on new submarines.
ATHENS—As Greece slashes spending to avoid default, it hasn’t moved to skimp on one area: defense.
Continue reading »