GM Has $15.5 Billion Loss on U.S. Sales Drop, Leases

Aug. 1 (Bloomberg) — General Motors Corp. reported a second-quarter loss of $15.5 billion, the third biggest in its 100-year history, because of plunging U.S. sales and the declining value of truck leases. The shares fell as much as 11 percent.

“…upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity…”
—Luke 21:25

“But he, knowing their thoughts, said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and a house divided against a house falleth.”
—Luke11:17

he deficit of $27.33 a share compares with a profit of $891 million, or $1.56, a year earlier. Excluding costs GM considers one-time, the per-share loss was 4 times bigger than analysts projected. Labor strikes contributed to a $9.9 billion drop in North American revenue, and sales worldwide tumbled 18 percent to $38.2 billion.

The results step up pressure on Chief Executive Officer Rick Wagoner, 55, to show he can revive the largest U.S. automaker. Wagoner, in his ninth year as CEO, has posted $69.8 billion in losses since 2004 and is trying to raise as much as $17 billion in cash while speeding the development of fuel-saving cars to replace the sport-utility vehicles being shunned by U.S. buyers.

“They really need those external fund-raising measures to get through to 2010,” said Brian Johnson, a Chicago-based Lehman Brothers analyst, in a Bloomberg Television interview. “We cannot count on an economic rebound.”

GM’s fourth straight quarterly loss comes as a weakened U.S. economy and soaring gasoline prices drag U.S. auto sales to 15- year lows. Demand for GM products dropped 16 percent through June, and analysts expect the automaker to report a decline in that range when July sales are released today.

“The second quarter has been one of the fastest-changing quarters I’ve ever seen” in terms of consumers switching from pickup trucks and SUVs to cars and small SUVs, Chief Financial Officer Ray Young told reporters in Detroit today.

Nissan, BMW Decline

The soft U.S. market is buffeting automakers worldwide. Ford Motor Co., the second-biggest U.S. car company behind GM, posted a record quarterly loss of $8.7 billion last week. Tokyo-based Nissan Motor Co. reported a 43 percent decline in profit today, while Germany’s Bayerische Motoren Werke AG said earnings slid by a third.

GM burned through $3.6 billion in the quarter and said today its supply of cash, marketable securities and other funds available fell to $21 billion on June 30, from $23.9 billion at the end of the first quarter.

GM fell 74 cents, or 6.7 percent, to $10.33 at 10.37 a.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading, after dropping to $9.90 earlier. The shares plunged 56 percent this year through yesterday, for the worst decline among the 30 companies in the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Residual Values

The Detroit-based automaker reported a $2 billion charge in the quarter because of the decline in residual values for leased vehicles.

Excluding costs such as a charge for an attrition program and an adjustment to its reserve for Delphi Corp. considered by GM to be one-time expenses, the loss was $6.3 billion, or $11.21 a share. On that basis, the company was forecast to lose $2.40 a share, the average of 12 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg.

GM was profitable in both its European and Latin America- Africa-Middle East region, posting profits of $20 million and $445 million, respectively. The automaker’s loss grew to $9.3 billion in North America, from a deficit of $88 million. In its Asia-Pacific region, GM had a loss of $163 million after a profit of $280 million a year earlier.

GMAC

About $1.2 billion of GM’s loss was related to the automaker’s partly owned GMAC finance unit.

GMAC yesterday reported a $716 million pretax expense for residual-value losses as part of a $2.5 billion second-quarter net loss. GMAC said it was able to reduce that cost because of $1.55 billion that the finance and mortgage company expects to receive from GM through risk-sharing and other agreements and $350 million in payments already made.

GMAC said it has $30 billion in North American leases. That includes $12 billion in SUVs and $6 billion in other trucks, vehicle types that are losing sales because of $4 gasoline.

The residual value is what a vehicle is worth when a customer returns it at the end of a lease. The lender’s residual losses average $11,000 a vehicle for GM models, GMAC Chief Financial Officer Robert Hull said yesterday.

The cost of protecting GM debt from default rose. The upfront cost of credit-default swaps on GM rose 3.5 percentage points to 45.5 percentage points, according to broker Phoenix Partners Group. as of 10:23 a.m. in New York. That means it costs $4.55 million initially and $500,000 a year to protect $10 million of bonds from default for five years.

Swaps

Credit-default swaps, contracts conceived to protect bondholders against default, pay the buyer face value in exchange for the underlying securities or the cash equivalent should a country, or company, fail to adhere to its debt agreements. A rise indicates deterioration in the perception of credit quality; a decline, the opposite.

GM’s 8.375 percent bond due July 2033 fell 1 cent on the dollar to 48 cents on the dollar, according to Trace, the bond- price reporting system of the Financial Industry Regulary Authority. The yield rose to 17.7 percent.

Standard & Poor’s yesterday cut GM’s credit rating one level to B-, or six steps below investment grade, because falling U.S. sales are causing the automaker to use more cash than anticipated. With the U.S. auto slump expected to carry into next year, GM faces a risk of further cuts, said Robert Schulz, an S&P debt analyst. GM had the highest rating, AAA, from 1953 until 1981.

Largest Losses

GM in 2007 reported its largest annual loss, $38.7 billion, after a tax-accounting change. The biggest quarterly loss, $39 billion in last year’s third quarter, topped a $21 billion deficit for an accounting change in the first quarter of 1992.

The automaker telegraphed today’s losses July 15 when it outlined plans to increase liquidity by as much as $17 billion by the end of next year by trimming salary payroll costs 20 percent, delaying some products and scrapping a 25-cent-a-share quarterly dividend.

Eliminating the dividend and an unspecified number of salaried jobs will help GM save $10 billion a year. GM plans to generate $4 billion to $7 billion by selling as yet unidentified assets and borrowing from banks.

Wagoner’s Scenario

The increased cash means the automaker will have enough to operate should U.S. sales fall to 14 million cars and trucks this year and next, lower than analysts expect, Wagoner told employees last month. GM also figures on oil costing $130 to $150 a barrel, compared with $124 currently.

GM has said the three-month walkout at former subsidiary American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings Inc. and a smaller strike at two vehicle plants cut first-half pretax earnings by $2.8 billion.

July auto sales, to be released after noon New York time, will match June’s annual selling rate of 13.6 million vehicles, according to a Bloomberg survey of 40 analysts and economists. That was the lowest level since 1993, when the industry was emerging from a recession.

“You can kind of look at July as a preview for the rest of the year,” S&P’s Schulz said. “We just expect sales to be weak.”

4 Comments

Lance Gilman says Comment posted on August 02nd, 2008

Sadly there those that suggest we need to ween ourselves from big trucks and SUV’s because they guzzle too much fuel, and they support high gas prices to “curb” our appetite. Preposterous! Read between the lines folks -
the high gas prices are a by product of conservation green policies that are trying control everything we do.

The automakers just need to make trucks and SUV’s more fuel efficient, make them better, not quit making them.

Those anti SUV “fuel rangers” need to stop trying to make this country socialist. Whatever happened to “Land of the FREE?”

Patt says Comment posted on August 03rd, 2008

The automakers just need to make trucks and SUV’s more fuel efficient, make them better, not quit making them.

I agree fully with this statement. I ask why have they not done it years ago(remember the gas lines of the 70′s), and why have we citizens not insisted it be done? It has been 32 years since fuel efficiency has been changed. In 1998 I bought a Yukon, which I still drive. I also sent a letter to GM that stated how much I enjoyed my new vehicle, and when the need to replace it arrives, I hope I can buy and electric model from GM. I of course did not receive a response, but, felt better for writing.

A few years ago, there was an infomercial? social comment? something on TV that showed a hydrogen cell converter for a combustion engine. They demonstrated a scooter, weed-eater, and said they had a prototype car in their showroom. This is just one of many possibilities we have to get out of our “oil addiction.” As I stated in another post, we have the technology, we just need the WILL, and Americans need to SPEAK up.

Blessings for a better tomorrow for our off-spring,
patt

Ernest Gregoire says Comment posted on August 04th, 2008

Dear Patt,

We live according to the laws of physics that God wrote.

You can’t get something for nothing.

Detroit has greatly improved performance and gas mileage in recent decades.
The dreaded SUV is at the heart of class warfare. The liberal left’s focus on the SUV as a “Rich Mans Car” making it an object of scorn by those who cannot afford one.

This false premises sets up a war of class envy, haves vs. the have nots.

Class envy caused people who will always be poor to hate the so called rich, (really people who know how to save). Liberals use this hatred to exploit the poor and stay in power.

Back to the SUV.

I am an itinerant evangelist. I travel around this country of ours to tell all who will listen about salvation through Jesus Christ. I live in a travel trailer pulled by a much maligned and dreaded SUV. It has the horse power to pull my 22 foot trailer up and down hill. It gets 10.7 miles to the gallon while towing, and “That is the way it is Bro!”

(If I owned a 35 foot trailer, I would need a diesel truck with much more horse power. Diesel cost almost a dollar more per gallon than gas.)

I cannot pull this trailer with a sub compact car.

Would I like to get better mileage? Sure I would, but reality is reality!

I use what there is available. Pie in the sky hydrogen technology has been around for 50 years and has not been utilized for good reason. It is too costly!

We are living in the end of days, there will be no future for unbelievers here on Earth as we know it today.

I spend my time and energy trying to get people saved before the inevitable happens. It is time and money will spent.

Arguing among ourselves about SUV gas mileage is a ploy of the liberal left.
Don’t fall for it!

Patt says Comment posted on August 06th, 2008

“Class envy caused people who will always be poor to hate the so called rich, (really people who know how to save). Liberals use this hatred to exploit the poor and stay in power”

We have heard all thru the primaries and now the general election, that “poor, uneducated, white folk” vote Republican. Their exploitation comes from conservatives. I know a lot of families who live in poverty, and they don’t seem to hate anyone. Hate is not a prerequisite for living within the means of a low income.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Freedom of speech is a good thing. However, if you must talk, be nice, don't use inappropriate language, and if you have criticism, keep it constructive. Thanks!

Fair Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Bible Prophecy News In Eu End Times Prophecy Earthquakes In Divers Places End Times News Bible End Times Christian Templates Russia And China End Times Prophecy As In The Days Of Noah Days Of Noah Lot Biblical Prophecies Pentagon End Time Prophecy Last Days News End Of Times News Bible Codes End Times Prediction Book of Revelation Knowledge Increased Days Of Noah Daniel Bible Prophecy America and Bible Prophecy Bible Code Prophecy USA in Bible Prophecy Rapture Armageddon Mark of the Beast