PA negotiator: Obama told Abbas he’d spare no effort to see Mideast peace

U.S. President-elect Barack Obama has called Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and told him that peace is a vital interest for Israelis and Palestinians, according to a Palestinian negotiator.

“For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.”
—2 Thessalonians 5:3

Saeb Erekat, who is the chief official responsible for overseeing peace negotiations with Israel, said that in a phone call late Tuesday, Obama told Abbas that he would spare no effort to facilitate a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians.

Meanwhile, President Shimon Peres said Tuesday that Obama proclaimed himself “very impressed” with the Arab League’s peace plan when the two discussed it during the American president-elect;s brief visit to Israel four months ago.

Peres, who had just arrived in London for an official visit, made the comment in interviews to be published in the British media. He was responding to questions about whether he thought Obama would advance the Middle East peace process in general and the Arab League’s plan in particular.

But he denied a Sunday Times report earlier this week which claimed that Obama had said Israel would be “crazy” to reject the Arab initiative.

On Monday, former American envoy to the Middle East Dennis Ross, who has been advising Obama on the subject, also denied reports that Obama had said while visiting Israel in July that he supported the Arab initiative and would base his own diplomatic policy on it.

The plan, originally proposed by King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia in 2002 and later adopted by the Arab League, states that Israel would receive full relations with the entire Arab world in exchange for a full withdrawal from all the territory it captured in 1967, including East Jerusalem, plus a solution to the refugee problem. The Bush Administration has said it views the plan positively, but its own road map peace plan and the understandings reached at last year’s Annapolis summit have served as the basis of its diplomatic program.

Peres said the Arab initiative was “not perfect,” mainly because it fails to address Jewish rights. Nevertheless, he said, it is worth negotiating, alongside the bilateral talks with the Palestinian Authority.

The plan’s big plus, he explained, is that it represents “a sea change” from the famous “three noes” – no peace with Israel, no recognition and no negotiations – of the Khartoum summit in 1967. In addition, he argued, it enables Israel to obtain peace with all the Arab states for the price of an agreement with the Palestinians.

Peres, who said the Arab plan was becoming “serious,” added that he did not think the United States would need to pressure Israel to advance the peace process, since Washington and Jerusalem “see eye to eye” on how to solve the conflict with the Palestinians.

Addressing the issue again during a visit to London’s old City Hall, where he received an honorary doctorate from University College London, Peres claimed that agreement had already been reached with the Palestinians on most issues, and all that remained was to reach a deal on territorial exchanges comprising 4 to 5 percent of the West Bank.

However, he added, Israel must be given guarantees because “in Gaza we failed. We took down 30 settlements by force, and there is not one Israeli citizen or soldier there anymore. But instead of settlements, they’ve built launching sites for missiles. And I have to give an answer to Israelis who are asking: ‘How can we be sure that it won’t happen if we leave more settlements?’”

Discussing negotiations with Syria, Peres noted that both Egypt and Jordan got back all the territory they lost in the Six-Day War by signing peace agreements with Israel, and that “if Syria changes its ways and goes in the direction of Egypt, it knows what it will receive.”

On another issue, Peres lashed out at repeated attempts by British university lecturers to impose an academic boycott on Israel, terming it “hypocritical.”

“Will the academics defend us? Will they defend our children?” he demanded. “Will they defend Sderot, which is being hit by missiles every day?”

Tuesday night, Peres gave a talk on peace and globalization at Oxford University, where he noted that Zionism arose in response to anti-Semitism and racism, but Obama’s election might herald the end of racism. He was periodically interrupted by pro-Palestinian hecklers.

On Wednesday, Peres will address both houses of Parliament, and on Thursday, he will meet with Queen Elizabeth II and Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

1 Comment

becca says Comment posted on November 20th, 2008

“…However, he added, Israel must be given guarantees…”
The guarantee has been given, if folks would just listen and get out of constant denial: Followers of Islam have promised to wipe Israel off the map as an act of faithfulness to their god. Muslims are permitted, in their holy book, to lie in order to achieve their goal of Israel’s destruction. So, they are going to “negotiate”(make false agreements) in order to gain more and more ground until they simply take over by violent force. Why is it so hard to understand? Even the leading Muslims state this openly! God help America and Israel to get a clue.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Freedom of speech is a good thing. However, if you must talk, be nice, don't use inappropriate language, and if you have criticism, keep it constructive. Thanks!

Fair Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Bible Prophecy News In Eu End Times Prophecy Earthquakes In Divers Places End Times News Bible End Times Christian Templates Russia And China End Times Prophecy As In The Days Of Noah Days Of Noah Lot Biblical Prophecies Pentagon End Time Prophecy Last Days News End Of Times News Bible Codes End Times Prediction Book of Revelation Knowledge Increased Days Of Noah Daniel Bible Prophecy America and Bible Prophecy Bible Code Prophecy USA in Bible Prophecy Rapture Armageddon Mark of the Beast