In The Days

• Source: Atlas Shrugs
• News Date: 10/17/09
• Submitted By: Andrea

On October 14, Lord Christopher Monckton, a noted climate change skeptic, gave a presentation at Bethel University in St. Paul, MN. In this 4 minute excerpt from his speech, he issues a dire warning to all Americans regarding the United Nations Climate Change Treaty, scheduled to be signed in Copenhagen in December 2009.

To view dictionary popup window put your cursor on the blue scripture words.

New World Order

“After this I saw in the night visions, and behold a fourth beast, dreadful•Strongs 1763: dchal, deh-khal´; (Aramaic) corresponding to 2119; to slink, i.e. (by implication) to fear, or (causatively) be formidable:—make afraid, dreadful, fear, terrible. and terrible•Strongs 574: emtaniy, em-taw-nee´; (Aramaic) from a root corresponding to that of 4975; well-loined (i.e. burly) or mighty:—terrible., and strong exceedingly; and it had great iron teeth: it devoured and brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with the feet of it: and it was diverse from all the beasts that were before it; and it had ten horns.”
—Daniel 7:7

Lord Monckton served as a policy adviser to Margaret Thatcher. He has repeatedly challenged Al Gore to a debate, which Gore has refused. Monckton sued to stop Gore’s film “An Inconvenient Truth” from being shown in British schools due to its inaccuracies. The judge found in favor of Monckton, ordering 9 serious errors in the film to be corrected. Lord Monckton travels internationally in an attempt to educate the public about the myth of global warming.

Eleventh hour, at the fifty-ninth minute and fifty-ninth second – OBAMA POISED TO CEDE US SOVEREIGNTY, CLAIMS BRITISH LORD (repub X)

The Minnesota Free Market Institute hosted an event at Bethel University in St. Paul on Wednesday evening. Keynote speaker Lord Christopher Monckton, former science adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, gave a scathing and lengthy presentation, complete with detailed charts, graphs, facts, and figures which culminated in the utter decimation of both the pop culture concept of global warming and the credible threat of any significant anthropomorphic climate change.

A detailed summary of Monckton’s presentation will be available here once compiled. However, a segment of his remarks justify immediate publication. If credible, the concern Monckton speaks to may well prove the single most important issue facing the American nation, bigger than health care, bigger than cap and trade, and worth every citizen’s focused attention.

Here were Monckton’s closing remarks, as dictated from my audio recording:

At [the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in] Copenhagen, this December, weeks away, a treaty will be signed. Your president will sign it. Most of the third world countries will sign it, because they think they’re going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regime from the European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won’t sign it.

I read that treaty. And what it says is this, that a world government is going to be created. The word “government” actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the West to third world countries, in satisfication of what is called, coyly, “climate debt” – because we’ve been burning CO2 and they haven’t. We’ve been screwing up the climate and they haven’t. And the third purpose of this new entity, this government, is enforcement.

How many of you think that the word “election” or “democracy” or “vote” or “ballot” occurs anywhere in the 200 pages of that treaty? Quite right, it doesn’t appear once. So, at last, the communists who piled out of the Berlin Wall and into the environmental movement, who took over Greenpeace so that my friends who funded it left within a year, because [the communists] captured it – Now the apotheosis as at hand. They are about to impose a communist world government on the world. You have a president who has very strong sympathies with that point of view. He’s going to sign it. He’ll sign anything. He’s a Nobel Peace Prize [winner]; of course he’ll sign it.

[laughter]

And the trouble is this; if that treaty is signed, your Constitution says that it takes precedence over your Constitution, and you can’t resign from that treaty unless you get agreement from all the other state parties – And because you’ll be the biggest paying country, they’re not going to let you out of it.

So, thank you, America. You were the beacon of freedom to the world. It is a privilege merely to stand on this soil of freedom while it is still free. But, in the next few weeks, unless you stop it, your president will sign your freedom, your democracy, and your humanity away forever. And neither you nor any subsequent government you may elect will have any power whatsoever to take it back. That is how serious it is. I’ve read the treaty. I’ve seen this stuff about [world] government and climate debt and enforcement. They are going to do this to you whether you like it or not.

But I think it is here, here in your great nation, which I so love and I so admire – it is here that perhaps, at this eleventh hour, at the fifty-ninth minute and fifty-ninth second, you will rise up and you will stop your president from signing that dreadful treaty, that purposeless treaty. For there is no problem with climate and, even if there were, an economic treaty does nothing to [help] it.

So I end by saying to you the words that Winston Churchill addressed to your president in the darkest hour before the dawn of freedom in the Second World War. He quoted from your great poet Longfellow:

Sail on, O Ship of State!
Sail on, O Union, strong and great!
Humanity with all its fears,
With all the hopes of future years,
Is hanging breathless on thy fate!

————————————- End of Speech ———–Some questions for Lord Monckton—–

Lord Monckton received a standing ovation and took a series of questions from members of the audience. Among those questions were these relevent to the forthcoming Copenhagen treaty:

Question: The current administration and the Democratic majority in Congress has shown little regard for the will of the people. They’re trying to pass a serious government agenda, and serious taxation and burdens on future generations. And there seems to be little to stop them. How do you propose we stop Obama from doing this, because I see no way to stop him from signing anything in Copenhagen. I believe that’s his agenda and he’ll do it.

Response: I don’t minimize the difficulty. But on this subject – I don’t really do politics, because it’s not right. In the end, your politics is for you. The correct procedure is for you to get onto your representatives, both in the US Senate where the bill has yet to go through (you can try and stop that) and in [the House], and get them to demand their right of audience (which they all have) with the president and tell him about this treaty. There are many very powerful people in this room, wealthy people, influential people. Get onto the media, tell them about this treaty. If they go to www.wattsupwiththat.com, they will find (if they look carefully enough) a copy of that treaty, because I arranged for it to be posted there not so long ago. Let them read it, and let the press tell the people that their democracy is about to be taken away for no good purpose, at least [with] no scientific basis [in reference to climate change]. Tell the press to say this. Tell the press to say that, even if there is a problem [with climate change], you don’t want your democracy taken away. It really is as simple as that.

Question: Is it really irrevocable if that treaty is signed? Suppose it’s signed by someone who does not have the authority, as I – I have some, a high degree of skepticism that we do have a valid president there because I know at least one judge who shares your opinion, sir, yes.

I don’t believe it until I see it. … Would [Obama's potential illegitimacy as president] give us a reasonable cause to nullify whatever treaty that he does sign as president?

Response: I would be very careful not to rely on things like that. Although there is a certain amount of doubt whether or not he was born in Hawaii, my fear is it would be very difficult to prove he wasn’t born in Hawaii and therefore we might not be able to get anywhere with that. Besides, once he’s signed that treaty, whether or not he signed it validly, once he’s signed it and ratified it – your Senate ratifies it – you’re bound by it. But I will say one thing; they know, in the White House, that they won’t be able to get the 67 votes in the Senate, the two-thirds majority that your Constitution has stipulated must be achieved in order to ratify a treaty of this kind. However, what they’ve worked out is this – and they actually let it slip during the election campaign, which is how I know about it. They plan to enact that Copenhagen treaty into legislation by a simple majority of both houses. That they can do. But the virtue of that – and here you have a point – is that is, thank God, reversible. So I want you to pray tonight, and pray hard for your Senate that they utterly refuse to ratify the [new] Treaty of Copenhagen, because if they refuse to ratify it and [Obama] has to push it through as domestic legislation, you can repeal it.

Regardless of whether global warming is taking place or caused to any degree by human activity, we do not want a global government empowered to tax Americans without elected representation or anything analogous to constitutional protections. The Founding Fathers would roll over in their graves if they knew their progeny allowed a foreign power such authority, effectively undoing their every effort in an act of Anti-American Revolution. If that is our imminent course, we need to put all else on hold and focus on stopping it. If American sovereignty is ceded, all other debate is irrelevant.

Verifying the treaty clauses Mockton made reference to:

Skimming through the treaty, I came across verification of Monckton’s assessment of the new entity’s purpose:

38. The scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the Convention will be based on three basic pillars: government; facilitative mechanism; and financial mechanism, and the basic organization of which will include the following:

World Government (heading added)
(a) The government will be ruled by the COP with the support of a new subsidiary body on adaptation, and of an Executive Board responsible for the management of the new funds and the related facilitative processes and bodies. The current Convention secretariat will operate as such, as appropriate.

To Redistribute Wealth (heading added)
b) The Convention’s financial mechanism will include a multilateral climate change fund including five windows: (a) an Adaptation window, (b) a Compensation window, to address loss and damage from climate change impacts [read: the "climate debt" Monckton refers to], including insurance, rehabilitation and compensatory components, © a Technology window; (d) a Mitigation window; and (e) a REDD window, to support a multi-phases process for positive forest incentives relating to REDD actions.

With Enforcement Authority (heading added)
© The Convention’s facilitative mechanism will include: (a) work programmes for adaptation and mitigation; (b) a long-term REDD process; © a short-term technology action plan; (d) an expert group on adaptation established by the subsidiary body on adaptation, and expert groups on mitigation, technologies and on monitoring, reporting and verification; and (e) an international registry for the monitoring, reporting and verification of compliance of emission reduction commitments, and the transfer of technical and financial resources from developed countries to developing countries. The secretariat will provide technical and administrative support, including a new centre for information exchange [read; enforcement].

I urge all Atlas readers immediately to contact your congressman NOW AND DEMAND that they do the job they were elected to do, keep America safe and protect her from her enemies, even if that enemy is in the White House.

Posted by Pamela Geller on Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 12:25 AM in Environ-MENTALISM, Global Warming uh cooling uh climate change, Relinguishing our Sovereignty to Islamicized UN | Permalink ShareThis
TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c60bf53ef0120a5ef2e1e970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference ACTION ALERT: Obama to Cede US Sovereignty in December:

» OBAMA TO CEDE U.S. SOVEREIGNTY IN DECEMBER from Muddling Toward Maturity Blog
So says Lord Christopher Monckton, a global warning skeptic, and former science adviser to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. Pamela Geller, of Atlas Shrugs, has posted one of the most dire warnings I have read in a long time. It represents… [Read More]

Tracked on Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 07:52 PM

Comments

I blogged about this as well. I am glad to see that the word is spreading.

Posted by: soccer mom | Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 01:25 AM

Does anyone have a link to the text of the treaty? Why is it that things of this magnitude are so hard to find? Didn’t we just elect the most transparent government in world history?

Posted by: ParahSalin | Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 01:36 AM

OK, I found two documents:

This one appears to be the final version, and does NOT appear to contain the language cited above:

http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/international/press/reports/ngo-copenhagen-treaty-legal.pdf

This is a working document, which contains a variety of wordings, options, etc. This appears to be the one referred to in this post, but it does NOT appear to be an actual, signable treaty:

http://tinyurl.com/yl3kwl6

(I made it a tinyurl)

I have no doubt there is plenty to object to in each document, but from what I see, world government is not one of them.

Another point – there is a slight error in the transcription of Lord Monckton’s speech.

As presented above:
“And the trouble is this; if that treaty is signed, if your Constitution says that it takes precedence over your Constitution (sic),”

Corrected version:
“And the trouble is this; if that treaty is signed, your Constitution says that it takes precedence over your Constitution,”

I removed an extraneous “if” and also the “(sic)”. He did not misspeak, although to those unfamiliar with the fine details of the Constitution it might seem that way. Check out Article VI of our dear, sweet, oh-so-abused Constitution.

The saving grace is that this treaty will likely not be Shariah compliant.

Posted by: ParahSalin | Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 02:20 AM

stunned

Posted by: dented | Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 02:29 AM

these wikidot unfccc links any good?

link

link

Posted by: dented | Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 02:56 AM

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/10/16/obama-poised-to-cede-us-sovereignty-in-copenhagen-claims-british-lord-monckton/#more-11739

Posted by: dented | Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 03:21 AM

a poster on the link above posted this..

Is this why they suddenly gave Obama that ill-deserved Nobel Pize? I wonder…

That would make a lot of sense.

Posted by: dented | Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 03:25 AM

Pamela Geller – Once again, thank you. Thank you for alerting us of this before anymore time passes. The deceit, the magnitude, the permanence of this is beyond comprehension.

Please excuse my ignorance, but where is that “bank” of frozen seeds? And who are the principal players?

May you be blessed with continued health and strength.

Posted by: L | Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 03:36 AM

Every warmist in the world keeps an F1 or Indy race car handy for when they hear Monkton is going to be around to make their getaway. This guy really knows his stuff and there is not a one of them in the world will debate him and he has offered to many times over the years.

Posted by: Bob Devine | Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 05:35 AM

Thank you, Pamela. Dear G-D, help America….!!! Please remove this current danger to the USA and Israel!! I have just read an interesting posting on “antimullah” re. the Orly Taitz case. Go read it !!! Judge Carter,you CAN help save this nation….!!!!! Please do what is right and correct in Law…..

Posted by: madeleine7 | Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 06:02 AM

I saw a youtube video last week with the podium placard message below Obama reading ‘Judgment to Lead’ and as I’ve been conditioned in dealing with all communists and moslems who twist the truth,’Lead to Judgment’ is what I saw.
What so many well meaning lovers of this once great nation are in denial about is that once God has become your enemy ,it’s over. To whom much is given,much is required. We’ve squandered our inheritance and the handwriting on the Obama wall is ‘God’s wrath is upon this God rejecting ,perverted,violent,sodomite land,there is no turning back. Get your house in order and learn the fear of God if you haven’t already because he is the only safety in this coming storm which He is sending on the wicked.

Posted by: rocketman | Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 08:38 AM

According to Jack Wheeler (google) it is a violation of constitutional law for any official to give away, loan away, sell away, sign away, treaty away, or any away, any measure of US sovereignty…This according to him is a violation that includes fines and imprisonment for the offending official…The reason for that is because US sovereignty does not belong to the official…It belongs to every American citizen…To sign it away is theft and treason…Impeach the usurper before he gives away the farm…

Posted by: duh_swami | Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 12:47 PM

Here is the text of Article VI of the US Constitution, as referenced further above by ParaSalin:

“All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”
I am not a Supreme, but Article VI definitely appears to (1) Give Mumbammuh the authority to bind the USA into whatever NWO/UN slavery he wishes, and (2) Supercede any & all Constitutional safeguards.

Scary stuff, so as rocketman says: “Get your house in order and learn the fear of God if you haven’t already …
Posted by: NextVoiceUHear | Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 12:57 PM

duh_swami suggests that “Impeach the usurper before he gives away the farm…” Amen to that, Brother. There is already at least one website devoted to Obama Impeachment and there are sure to be others. One good reason is of course that under Article II Section I of the Constitution, Obama may be Constitutionally Unqualified to be POTUS. – Oh No!! I guess that makes me a (gasp) Birther! I better lighten up with a little humor: An Obama Bumper Sticker Slideshow

Posted by: NextVoiceUHear | Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 01:32 PM

You say you want a revolution, well you know…….

…….. it’s coming.

————

The creation and first empowerment of a one-world government.

This has all the makings of The Blue Helmets marching up Main Street within a year or two at the most.

Also, please remember there’s The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child that basically strips parents of their rights to set upbringing parameters, instruct, educate and discipline their children…… The UN Convention On The Rights Of The Child

…… and of course, The Organization of American States has “C.I.F.T.A.”, which basically disarms the population base of not just firearms, but anything that can be taken as a constructed weapon or device. Expect The UN to embrace “C.I.F.T.A.” and expand it exponentially. C.I.F.T.A.

Kenny Solomon
Senior Expediter
The 72 Virgins Club Travel Agency
Bacon-wrapped rounds a specialty.

Posted by: Kenny Solomon | Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 02:43 PM

ParahSalin at 02:20 AM: “…from what I see, world government is not one of them”.

It is disguised as a body which keep track of and judge in carbon credit- and carbon regulation issues. In the Copenhagen treaty you find the text I quote below. I guess it imply and refers to what is mentioned in the document quoted by Monckton.

The intentions are quite clear. The climate crisis doesn’t actually exist, but particularly the left, supported by media, delivers false alarming propaganda which has become mainstream, which is absurd.

the document “A Copenhagen Climate Treaty Version 1.0″:

“1. A Carbon Market Regulatory Agency is hereby established.
In order to provide credibility for the carbon market and ensure that it maintains
high quality standards, a new Carbon Market Regulatory Authority should be established.
This Authority should have full oversight of preparations for Parties to participate
in the carbon market, whether on the national, sectoral or project level. The Authority
should be made up of carbon market experts, not government representatives and have
a fair amount of independence to operate. The Authority should also be empowered
with a strong capacity building function to assist countries in developing the institutional
and technical capacity and the know-how to participate in the carbon market if they
so choose. Provisions to this effect should be included in the Protocol.”

I would say it’s impossible to create international carbon trade and carbon regulation (on all stuffs) without a powerful global authority. I’m sad to say this. I’m no NWO conspiracy person, but I think this is the way the left tries to limit free market economy, which will mean less prosperity and freedom.

Monckton is sometimes a bit bold and/or wrong and I’m not surprised if he slightly exaggerate, but I think this is a serious threat.

Posted by: Kattaren | Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 03:05 PM

Another tip on this issue is Investor’s Business Daily, March 27 on “Copenhagen: Environmental Munich”:

groups.yahoo.com/group/proprights/message/1665

Also a new 22 minutes video Climate Chains:

vimeo.com/7030026

Myron Ebell (CEI) at 07:35 :
“The Earth has been experienced a mild warming trend since probably the middle of the 19th century, when the planet started to come out of the little ice age, which lasted for about 300 or 400 years. The effects of this warming have been mild, mostly beneficial, and have caused human beings very little trouble. We have seen a flourishing of humanity.”

Myron Ebell at 11:33 :
“We’re being told that what we need is more government control of the economy, and that we need to move back towards that model of the government telling people how much energy they can use, which is exactly what the Soviet Union did and which not only incredibly poverty and low standard of living but led to this huge environmental horror.”

Speaker voice at 18:40 :
“Is it truly a scientific battle? Increasingly it appears to be an ideological struggle between forces that see human innovation and progress as unnatural, or undesirable, and those that see free markets as the answer.”

Posted by: Kattaren | Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 03:08 PM

Pamela, Thank you for posting this. Forewarned is forearmed. We must spread the word, prepare ourselves and our families, and pray. The days are growing short and Dec. is near. Please keep up the good work. Let’s hope we can get Obama out of office and restore God and sanity to their proper places in this wonderful country.

Posted by: bomeg | Saturday, October 17, 2009 at 04:52 PM

NextVoiceUHear:

Article VI does not trump the Bill of Rights … they are an amendment, and have precedence over the Articles ( read the Article that handles Amendments carefully ).

Treaties can also be abrogated at will by the congress.

Obambi gets his greenhouse gas bull only as long as he or his cronies retain power.