Over-the-counter sales of morning-after pill soar

NEW YORK — In the year since it was approved for over-the-counter sales, the morning-after pill has become a huge commercial success for its manufacturer, but its popularity and solid safety record haven’t deterred critics from seeking to overturn the milestone ruling.

“Yea, they sacrificed their sons and their daughters unto devils, And shed innocent blood, even the blood of their sons and of their daughters, whom they sacrificed unto the idols of Canaan: and the land was polluted with blood. Thus were they defiled with their own works, and went a whoring with their own inventions.”
—Psa 106:37-39

The pill, marketed by Barr Pharmaceuticals Inc. as Plan B, was the focus of bitter debate for three years. After repeated delays, the Food and Drug Administration declared on Aug. 24, 2006 that customers 18 and older should be able to buy it in pharmacies without a prescription.

Barr began distributing the over-the-counter version last November, and all national pharmacy chains now stock it. The company projects that sales of Plan B will total about $80 million for 2007, almost double the total for 2006 and up eightfold from 2004, when Barr acquired the product as a prescription-only drug.

“Overall, we’ve been very pleased with the acceptance,” said Barr spokeswoman Carol Cox. “The product may not be for everyone — but if you find yourself in a position to need it, absolutely it should be available.”

Despite the booming sales, and evidence that the pill is safe if properly used, critics remain active.

A coalition of conservative groups, including the Family Research Council and Concerned Women for America, has filed a lawsuit in federal court in Washington seeking to reverse the FDA ruling. The groups contend that the FDA acted unwisely under political pressure and lacked authority to approve the same drug for both over-the-counter and prescription-only distribution based on the user’s age.

“Barr may be making a healthy profit, but women are paying the price,” said Wendy Wright, president of Concerned Women for America, who believes Plan B is less effective that its backers assert.

Barr says Plan B, a high dose of a drug found in many regular birth-control pills, can lower the risk of pregnancy by up to 89 percent if taken within 72 hours of unprotected sex.

Since the FDA ruling, there have been extensive efforts by advocacy groups and some politicians to ensure widespread availability of Plan B.

— Several states have enacted laws to improve rape survivors’ access to the medication in hospital emergency rooms; a similar bill has been introduced in Congress.

— Also in Congress, supporters of Plan B have introduced legislation to ensure that women serving in the U.S. military overseas have access to the pills at their bases. The measure’s backers say servicewomen and military doctors often can’t obtain the medication when it’s needed.

— Planned Parenthood, NARAL Pro-Choice America and their allies have campaigned to educate women about Plan B and pressure national pharmacy chains to make it readily available. Overall, activists are pleased with the chains’ response, but they say women continue to encounter pharmacies which refuse to stock Plan B and individual employees who, for reasons of conscience, refuse to sell it.

“Many women still don’t know it’s available,” said NARAL’s president, Nancy Keenan. “There’s a lot of education that needs to be done.”

During three years of FDA deliberations over Plan B, many claims were made about it. Supporters said it would reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and abortions; opponents said it would fuel teenage promiscuity because girls under 18 could obtain it from an older person — male or female — buying it over-the-counter on their behalf.

Thus far, there have been several studies casting doubt on all these claims — although activists of varying views say there is a shortage of authoritative research. Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, believes Plan B will contribute to a measurable drop in unintended pregnancies once accurate information about it spreads widely among American women.

“We’re talking about very mainstream health care here,” Richards said. “And yet there is a fringe group of folks in this country who seem determined to prevent women from getting emergency contraception.”

Some critics — including Roman Catholic leaders — consider the pill tantamount to abortion, although Barr says it has no effect on women who are already pregnant. Catholic bishops in Connecticut protested in May when the state legislature passed a bill requiring all hospitals, including Catholic facilities, to offer Plan B to rape victims

Deirdre McQuade, planning director for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities, also expressed concern about pharmacy employees, saying they should have the right to refuse to sell Plan B for reasons of conscience. Some states have passed laws to protect this right of refusal.

“Pregnancy is not a disease,” McQuade said. “There is no absolute duty to dispense a non-therapeutic drug, but there is a basic civil right of conscience.”

2 Comments

Kevin Wilson says Comment posted on August 23rd, 2007

This article just makes me sick! How can the say it will reduce unwanted pregnancy and abortion when the pill itself causes an abortion of an unwanted pregnancy. This is the dichotomy of the devil, plain and simple. May God have mercy on our nation and it’s legal system for allowing such an abomination.

Kevin

Peregrina says Comment posted on August 24th, 2007

How heartbreaking this is…it just disturbs me to hear an abortion pill (or, for that matter, an abortion) referred to as “contraception”. No one ever asks as pregnant woman, “When is your fetus due?” or “Oh, is the fetus kicking?”, yet when these same people want to promote abortion, instantly the baby is downgraded to a less-than-human status.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Freedom of speech is a good thing. However, if you must talk, be nice, don't use inappropriate language, and if you have criticism, keep it constructive. Thanks!

Fair Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Bible Prophecy News In Eu End Times Prophecy Earthquakes In Divers Places End Times News Bible End Times Russia And China End Times Prophecy As In The Days Of Noah Days Of Noah Lot Biblical Prophecies Pentagon End Time Prophecy Last Days News End Of Times News Bible Codes End Times Prediction Book of Revelation Knowledge Increased Days Of Noah Daniel Bible Prophecy America and Bible Prophecy Bible Code Prophecy USA in Bible Prophecy Rapture Armageddon Mark of the Beast