The $100 Million Health Care Vote?

What does it take to get a wavering senator to vote for health care reform?

To view dictionary popup window put your cursor on the blue scripture words.
Days of Noah

“But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.”
—Matt 24:37

Corruption

”The earth also was corrupt•Strongs 7843: shachath, shaw-khath´; a primitive root; to decay, i.e. (causatively) ruin (literally or figuratively):—batter, cast off, corrupt(-er, thing), destroy(-er, -uction), lose, mar, perish, spill, spoiler, x utterly, waste(-r). before God,and the earth was filled with violence”.
—Gen 6:11

Here’s a case study.

On page 432 of the Reid bill, there is a section increasing federal Medicaid subsidies for “certain states recovering from a major disaster.”

The section spends two pages defining which “states” would qualify, saying, among other things, that it would be states that “during the preceding 7 fiscal years” have been declared a “major disaster area.”

I am told the section applies to exactly one state: Louisiana, the home of moderate Democrat Mary Landrieu, who has been playing hard to get on the health care bill.

In other words, the bill spends two pages describing would could be written with a single world: Louisiana. (This may also help explain why the bill is long.)

Senator Harry Reid, who drafted the bill, cannot pass it without the support of Louisiana’s Mary Landrieu.

How much does it cost? According to the Congressional Budget Office: $100 million.

Here’s the incredibly complicated language:

SEC. 2006. SPECIAL ADJUSTMENT TO FMAP DETERMINATION FOR CERTAIN STATES RECOVERING FROM A MAJOR DISASTER.

Section 1905 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d), as amended by sections 2001(a)(3) and
2001(b)(2), is amended— (1) in subsection (b), in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘subsection (y)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsections (y) and (aa)’’; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:

‘‘(aa)(1) Notwithstanding subsection (b), beginning January 1, 2011, the Federal medical assistance percentage for a fiscal year for a disaster-recovery FMAP adjustment State shall be equal to the following:
‘(A) In the case of the first fiscal year (or part of a fiscal year) for which this subsection applies to the State, the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the fiscal year without regard to this subsection and subsection (y), increased by 50 percent of the number of percentage points by which the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the State for the fiscal year without regard to this subsection and subsection (y), is less than the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the State for the preceding fiscal year after the application of only subsection (a) of section 5001 of Public Law 111–5 (if applicable to the preceding fiscal year) and without regard to this subsection, subsection (y), and subsections (b) and (c) of section 5001 of Public Law 111–5.

‘‘(B) In the case of the second or any succeeding fiscal year for which this subsection applies to the State, the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the preceding fiscal year under this subsection for the State, increased by 25 percent of the number of percentage points by which the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the State for the fiscal year without regard to this subsection and subsection (y), is less than the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the State for the preceding fiscal year under this subsection.

‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘disaster-recovery FMAP adjustment State’ means a State that is one of
the 50 States or the District of Columbia, for which, at any time during the preceding 7 fiscal years, the President has declared a major disaster under section 401 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act and determined as a result of such disaster that every county or parish in the State warrant individual and public assistance or public assistance from the Federal Government under such Act and for which— ‘‘(A) in the case of the first fiscal year (or part of a fiscal year) for which this subsection applies to the State, the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the State for the fiscal year without regard to this subsection and subsection (y), is less than the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the State for the preceding fiscal year after the application of only subsection (a) of section 5001 of Public Law 111–5 (if applicable to the preceding fiscal year) and without regard to this subsection, subsection (y), and subsections (b) and (c) of section 5001 of Public Law 111–5, by at least 3 percentage points; and ‘‘(B) in the case of the second or any succeeding fiscal year for which this subsection applies to the State, the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the State for the fiscal year without regard to this subsection and subsection (y), is less than the Federal medical assistance percentage determined for the State for the preceding fiscal year under this subsection by at least 3 percentage points.

‘‘(3) The Federal medical assistance percentage determined for a disaster-recovery FMAP adjustment State under paragraph (1) shall apply for purposes of this title (other than with respect to disproportionate share hospital payments described in section 1923 and payments under this title that are based on the enhanced FMAP described in 2105(b)) and shall not apply with respect to payments under title IV (other than under part E of title IV) or payments under title XXI.’’.

4 Comments

mike says Comment posted on November 21st, 2009

The money these sell outs will be accepting ,who pays for it , we the people. And when this health care bill gets shoved down our throats,who pays for it ,we the people. What a disaster this is.

stesse says Comment posted on November 21st, 2009

Woe to us because of evil leaders forgetting their place is to serve the citizens, not to make servants of the citizens. Lies and deception come from their father, the devil. How did we get into this predicament? God SAVE us!

cam says Comment posted on November 27th, 2009

As a follower of Jesus living in a country that does have universal health care for it’s citizens I am constantly amazed at what seems to be the alarmist reactionary view of many in the US towards making health care available to ALL. I wonder how many of those who raise their voices in protest are without medical coverage themselves? The US can find billions to fund wars, like Vietnam, Irag, Afghanistan not to mention the clandestine activities of the US government and yet can’t look after it’s own less advantaged citizens, crying out that it will bankrupt the country. Hasn’t happened in Austsralia, Canada, UK, Scandinavia et al. there poor parents can have peace of mind that knowing their children will recieve medical care. I would ask that you consider how the rest of the world looks at you when your arguments appear to boil down to veiled economic rationalism at the best, in opposing using the resources of the most wealthy nation in the world to look after “the least”.

mike says Comment posted on December 08th, 2009

Dear cam i see your point.But as a follower of Jesus you should also not want to fund abortions which the health care bill has within its pages.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Freedom of speech is a good thing. However, if you must talk, be nice, don't use inappropriate language, and if you have criticism, keep it constructive. Thanks!

Fair Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Bible Prophecy News In Eu End Times Prophecy Earthquakes In Divers Places End Times News Bible End Times Christian Templates Russia And China End Times Prophecy As In The Days Of Noah Days Of Noah Lot Biblical Prophecies Pentagon End Time Prophecy Last Days News End Of Times News Bible Codes End Times Prediction Book of Revelation Knowledge Increased Days Of Noah Daniel Bible Prophecy America and Bible Prophecy Bible Code Prophecy USA in Bible Prophecy Rapture Armageddon Mark of the Beast